Recognize the unrecognized through dialogue

I feel that it is common to "notice blind spots through dialogue".

What is this "dialogue"?

It is not required to be voice

It doesn't have to be one-on-one.

Condition 2: If you have faith that "the other person's reasoning is working correctly

Ah, this seems to be the basic premise.

I don't have much sympathy for this.

In a recent specific example, I was impressed by a "word I thought I knew well" like "interesting" and found a surprising discrepancy when I carefully delved into what I thought about it with someone who is not me. I imagined the phenomenon of "I feel satisfied with the scenery from the other person's point of view.

What you get is not a "new word" but a "new perspective on an existing word."

When something like this happens, search for "interesting" in your past writings and look at them from a new perspective, and you may discover even more new things!

This is probably the kind of situation I'm talking about.

https://gyazo.com/9da5d7370d023cfe3face61ee6e88dd1

1: Mr. A mentions X

2: Mr. B, who was listening to it, mentions Y as relevant to it

3: Mr. A does not know Y, so he asks a question

Mr. A is certainly getting a new Y in this situation.

But I think this is "get the top of the pyramid."

Mr. B stabilizes Y by building up

If you just keep getting the tops, they'll fall down, and Mr. A needs to take the time to acquire the boxes to fill in the spaces in between.

https://gyazo.com/79c27f58d07db06a5ccb06665b008c8f

What if I draw it in more detail?

https://gyazo.com/cc64bdadc7333455bdac141dd27cc046

First X and Y need to be connected, then other roots are needed to stabilize Y

Maybe "acquiring new words" makes me nervous because it still feels unconnected.

relevance

---